The Leftism ideology as a biological phenomenon – A scientific view

The following article is very interesting. It describes the leftism ideology as a biological phenomenon based on scientific research. Studies on Left- and Right-Wing psychology have consistently found that Leftists are more likely to exhibit manipulative, self-serving, and generally antisocial personality traits. An other interesting finding is that Leftists claimed to care more about “all natural things in the universe including inert entities, such as rocks” than they do about their own family and friends.

Source of this article: https://biopolitics.substack.com/

1. Defining “Leftism”

Leftism is characterized by ideas like equality, fraternity, “progress,” societal reform, and globalism. This manifests politically as support for feminism, homosexuality, wealth redistribution, immigration, and racial egalitarianism, combined with opposition to family, nationalism, and traditional culture.

The rejection or embrace of hierarchy is the fundamental difference between Left- and Right-Wing worldviews. Right-Wingers believe that hierarchy is inherent to reality and part of the natural order, while Leftists claim to believe that all men are fundamentally “equal” [1] [2].

2. Leftism and Physical Biology

Countless studies have shown that physical characteristics closely align with political orientation. A.I. facial recognition can accurately predict a person’s political alignment 72% of the time, outperforming chance (50%) and human estimation (55%) [3].

Taller [4] and more attractive [5] people are more likely to identify as Right-Wing and more likely to actively support Right-Wing parties, policies, and politicians. In America, Australia, and Europe, Right-Wing politicians are more likely to be physically attractive than their Left-Wing counterparts [6].

Men who are physically stronger are more likely to oppose wealth redistribution [7] and other forms of sociopolitical egalitarianism, even if they are poor themselves. Opposition to egalitarianism grows as men spend more time in the gym [8]. Similarly, men with more masculine facial features are more likely to support explicitly prejudiced ideas [9], and men who are better fighters are more likely to support warfare and hold “self-favoring” (non-Leftist) political beliefs [10].

In summary: Leftists are shorter and uglier, and Leftist men are weaker, less masculine, and less capable of fighting. These are all characteristics that are not helpful to success in any human civilization.

3. Leftist Psychology 101

Studies on Left- and Right-Wing psychology have consistently found that Leftists are more likely to exhibit manipulative, self-serving, and generally antisocial personality traits. For example, Leftists have abnormally low disgust sensitivity [11]. A person’s political alignment can be predicted with 95% accuracy by observing their brain’s response to one disgusting image [12].

Despite Leftist claims that their ideology is “just being a good person,” support for wealth redistribution is best predicted by the psychological traits of “communal fairness” (egalitarianism), malicious envy, spite, being self-interested, and willingness to inflict “instrumental harm” (hurting innocent people for “the greater good”) [13]. The stereotypical Left-Wing behavior of “victimhood signaling” correlates with personality traits such as narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism (amoral manipulation) [14]. Victimhood signaling is best described as an emotional manipulation technique used to obtain free resources.

On average, Right-Wingers are much happier than Leftists. This phenomenon has been attributed to a variety of factors, including the ideological rationalization of inequality (“inequality is natural” vs “inequality is unfair”) [15]. However, the most logical explanation is that Leftists are predisposed to mental illness [16]. Numerous studies have found that Leftists are far more neurotic than Right-Wingers [17] and that White Far-Leftists are four times more likely to be mentally ill than moderate Right-Wingers. It is currently unclear whether Leftism causes mental illness or whether mentally ill people are instinctively drawn to Leftism. Both may be true simultaneously.

The psychological differences between Left- and Right-Wing people can be partially attributed to physical differences in brain structure. For example, Right-Wing views are associated with a larger amygdala [18], which is associated with higher emotional intelligence (for example: reading body language or personal space) [19] and the ability to maintain more complex social networks [20]. The amygdala also plays a causal role in threat detection [21]. This data contradicts studies by Far-Left sociologists, like Alain Van Hiel, which claim that Right-Wing beliefs are defined by low emotional intelligence.

4. Moral Foundations of the Left- and Right-Wing

The Moral Foundations Theory, originally coined by psychology professor Jonathan Haidt and colleagues, proposes that Left- and Right-Wing people build their worldviews on five major “Moral Foundations.” Leftists are disproportionately high in the individualizing traits of Harm Avoidance and Fairness, but disproportionately low in the group-orientated traits of In-Group Loyalty, Respect for Authority, and Purity. In contrast, Right-Wingers express all five traits equally [22] [23].

Countless studies support the Moral Foundations theory, but one statistic related to in-group preference is particularly significant: White Leftists, who are by far the most mentally ill demographic, have a negative in-group preference, meaning that they genuinely despise their own race and will always tendency to prioritize the group interests of foreign races above their own.

A study from 2019 investigated the self-reported “moral circle” of Left- and Right-Wing people [24]. Participants were asked to assign 100 “moral units” to 16 categories, ranging from their “(1) immediate family” and “(2) closest friends” to “(15) all natural things in the universe” and “(16) all things in existence.” The categories did not overlap, so points attributed to ‘higher’ categories (the universe) were not shared with ‘lower’ categories (the family). Leftists claimed to care more about “all natural things in the universe including inert entities, such as rocks” than they do about their own family and friends.

The information listed in section 3 of this study casts severe doubt upon the sincerity of their “universal love.” It seems much more likely that an immoral, narcissistic, and manipulative psychopath would use performative virtue signaling to conceal their malevolent and self-serving intentions. This is supported by new data from a 2022 study, which found that self-reported “good moral character” actually predicts moral hypocrisy, rather than good moral character [25].

5. Conclusion: A profile of the average Leftist

Using the data compiled above, we can construct a basic psychological profile of the typical Leftist. This will of course not apply to every Left-Wing individual, but it can serve as a general framework for understanding and dealing with Leftists. So, generally speaking…

• Leftists believe that life is fundamentally unfair, likely due to their own undesirable physical characteristics (shortness, ugliness, weakness, etc.).
• This causes neuroticism and leads to self-obsession and spiteful envy.
• They lose all concern for group interests and focus exclusively on advancing their own standing in society.
• As they cannot get ahead in fair competition, they resort to underhanded, manipulative, and psychopathic strategies.
• This manifests as behaviors like victimhood/virtue signaling, gaslighting, and other forms of coercion and emotional abuse.
• To disguise their immoral and self-serving aims, they proclaim a universal love for humanity, nature, or the even entire material universe.
• They collaborate with other outcasts and potentially dangerous groups to exact vengeance on their perceived “oppressors,” by which they mean normal people.
• However, they will happily betray their friends and allies, who they value as little as inert objects like rocks, for social gains.

The leftist ideology can thus be summarized as an attempt to climb the social ladder via underhanded tactics, such as eliminating the competition by promoting “equality,” and dragging everyone down to their level: The gutter. Leftism is a strategy for losers to take power and resources from winners.

The key takeaway is this: When it comes to Leftists, we are not dealing with honest people who want what is best for society but are tragically mistaken about how this can be achieved. Such individuals certainly exist on the Left, but the average Leftist is spiteful, malicious, and revengeful. They cannot be reasoned with or rationally convinced of their “mistakes” because they are driven by deep-rooted biological and psychological issues that, in many cases cannot be resolved. Use extreme caution when dealing with them. They would think nothing of using the system to destroy your life.

6. Addendum: On Leftist ideological domination

Some readers have correctly pointed out that many “Left-Wing” people are simply indoctrinated into Leftism by default, because it is the dominating ideology of the current globalist regime. Leftism dominates every facet of Western society: media, academia, governments, corporations, and so on. Westerners are born into Leftism like fish into water, and many are unaware that they are under an ideological spell.

Genuine “biological Leftists” should be distinguished from the indoctrinated masses who merely repeat and believe what society tells them is right and true. Without the corrosive influence of the Leftist dominance such individuals would be normal, loyal, and valuable members of society. However, the “true Leftists” would probably be just the same without it.

7. Sources

1. We Thought Conservatives Saw the World as More Dangerous, We Were Wrong (2022)
2. Belief in a Dangerous World Does Not Explain Substantial Variance in Political Attitudes, But Other World Beliefs Do (2022)
3. Facial recognition technology can expose political orientation from naturalistic facial images (2021)
4. Height, Income and Voting (2016)
5. Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs (2017)
6. The right look: Conservative politicians look better (2017)
7. The Ancestral Logic of Politics: Upper-Body Strength (2013)
8. Is sociopolitical egalitarianism related to bodily and facial formidability in men? (2017)
9. Facial Structure Is Indicative of Explicit Support for Prejudicial Beliefs (2016)
10. The importance of physical strength to human males (2012)
11. Disgust Sensitivity and the Neurophysiology of Left-Right Political Orientations (2011)
12. Left or right-wing? Brain’s disgust response tells all (2014)
13. Each is to count for one and none for more than one: Predictors of support for economic redistribution (2021)
14. Signaling virtuous victimhood as indicators of Dark Triad personalities (2021)
15. Why are conservatives happier than liberals? (2008)
16. Why Do Conservatives Report Being Happier Than Liberals? The Contribution of Neuroticism (2015)
17. Mental Illness and the Left (2020)
18. Political Orientations Are Correlated with Brain Structure in Young Adults (2011)
19. ALE meta-analysis on facial judgments of trustworthiness and attractiveness (2014)
20. Amygdala Volume and Social Network Size in Humans (2011)
21. Impaired threat prioritisation after selective bilateral amygdala lesions (2015)
22. Liberals and Conservatives Rely on Different Sets of Moral Foundations (2009)
23. Moral Foundations Theory (Wikipedia)
24. Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle (2019)
25. Being good to look good: Self-reported moral character predicts moral double standards among reputation-seeking individuals (2022)