Some voices online claim the mission that started on april fools’ day is a staged event. People say astronauts are actors and the mission itself is fabricated, potentially generated or manipulated by artificial intelligence (AI). This article examines these claims and the facts surrounding the Artemis II and the earlier so called moon missions. So is the NASA Artemis II fake?
The Artemis II Mission Overview
According to NASA: Artemis II is the first crewed mission in the Artemis program, which intends to return humans to the Moon and establish a sustainable presence there. Unlike previous missions, Artemis II is designed as a lunar flyby. It is said astronauts will go around the Moon but not land. The mission aims to test spacecraft systems and human endurance in deep space conditions.
Why Many Believe the NASA Mission Artemis II Is Fake
Skepticism about space missions is not new. It has been around for decades this includes the clear indications that Apollo Moon landings were staged. Every time NASA makes some space video, people point out inconsistencies in the footage. In the case of Artemis II, several arguments fuel this even more. Why people think NASA Artemis II is Fake?
People point out inconsistencies in the footage. Videos on the mission’s progress are limited, leading some to question the authenticity of the footage and images shared by NASA.
AI and Deepfake Technologies: With advances in AI, creating highly realistic images, videos, and simulations is more accessible. Some pointed out that NASA uses AI-generated content to simulate the mission without actual space travel. Only a lauch could be real, but does not go to what they call ”space”.
Astronauts as Actors: The claim that astronauts are actors rather than trained space professionals is a recurring theme in conspiracy circles. This notion suggests the entire mission is a performance to further their deception
The deeper you dig, the more the official narrative falls apart. The inconsistencies, the lack of follow-up missions, and the government’s continued secrecy about extraterrestrial life all point to one conclusion: We never landed on the moon in 1969, and the government has been hiding the truth about space and aliens ever since.
Why would NASA lie?
NASA’s deception serves to promote a worldview where humans are insignificant, emerging from random chance in a vast, meaningless universe. This narrative dismisses any notion of a higher purpose or divine creator.
They want us to believe we came from nothing out of nowhere, for no reason. The globe earth and the illusion of space have been made to make this in your mind an acceptable idea. They want us to think we came here because of coincidence and that we are insignificant. However the truth is the opposite with all these things. We did not came from nothing out of nowhere, we are not insignificant and we have a purpose! Earth is not a spinning ball, it is geostationary, not moving and there is no curvature to be measured or observed. NASA lies not about one thing, but everything they claim is a lie. But the ultimate goal is to make us believe that there is no GOD.
About fake images of NASA
A growing number of researchers and skeptics argue that NASA’s photos of earth are not authentic photographs but rather digitally manipulated composites. Some even claim they are entirely computer-generated. More suspiciously, NASA has been caught reusing the same image multiple times under different dates and missions, raising serious questions about their credibility.
The evidence suggests that the images are not authentic photographs but rather digital composites designed to fit the globe model. The fact that they reuse the same image under different names is highly suspicious.
What about sattelites?
Ever heard this one: satellites do not exist! There are many reasons satellites – as NASA shows them to us are actually no flying objects in orbit around planet earth. You may think that this is a ridiculous statement, because how would we have GPS or telephone connections? To get to know the answer i would like to invite you to the wonderful world of satellites and techniques that substitute satellites. Read more about this: Techniques that substitute satellites – Real Satellites Of NASA
Buzz Aldrin on the moon landing: ”you watched animation”
Buzz Aldrin won’t swear on the Bible that he went to the Moon. This and much more is to see in the dunumentary of Bart Sibrel: called Astronauts Gone Wild. This documentary is about an investigation into the authenticity of the moon landings. The documentary video was produced and directed by Bart Sibrel. Bart is a video maker who charges that the six Apollo Moon landings in the 1960s and 1970s were elaborate hoaxes.
On the Youtube channel HighImpactVlogs the question is also asked: Artemis 2 REAL or FAKE Moon Mission?!
Conclusion on the question: Is NASA Artemis II Fake?
In short: The NASA Artemis II mission is fake. Like all other videos of space walks. When you put all together you can clearly see that NASA Artemis II is also Fake. The purpose of this deception is clear. They want us to think we came here because of coincidence and that we are insignificant. However the truth is the opposite with all these things. We did not came from nothing out of nowhere, we are not insignificant and we have a purpose!
Final thoghts – What you can do
This post only scratches the surface. There is much more to say about this topic. On Mediocremonday.com there is more information on this subject.
This is what you can do:
- Research independently look at raw satellite data, Nasa footage, and astronaut testimonies. Some links were added in this post.
- Question mainstream narratives. Why does NASA rely so heavily on CGI?
- Spread awareness. Share this article and other investigations into NASA’s fakery.
Artemis II Fake Image Explained
Read more about the fake image of earth that NASA published: Artimis II fake image explained.
About the Author
Fake! Fake! ……Fake! Fake!
-Eliane Bettis on Seinfeld
Or nasa moon/artimus stuff
Same/same
Always believed that NASA putting people on the Moon in 1969 was fake. How come, in 2016 (57 years later) NASA has (supposedly) sent a rocket to circumnavigate the Moon rather than actually landing on the Moon? What with all of the technological advances you would of thought it would have been so much easier? All seems to smack of balderdash if you ask me, sorry.